Comments for Veritas Curat http://aeom.net/blog Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:29:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on DIY Dodecad 2.0 results by Martin http://aeom.net/blog/2011/08/diy-dodecad-2-0-results/#comment-8 Martin Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:29:30 +0000 http://striz.net/?p=1364#comment-8 Ivan, you change the last line of the dv3.par file from "genomewide" to byseg 500 50 Then run it like normal, either ./DIYDodecadLinux32 dv3.par or ./DIYDodecadLinux64 dv3.par Ivan, you change the last line of the dv3.par file from “genomewide” to

byseg
500
50

Then run it like normal, either ./DIYDodecadLinux32 dv3.par

or ./DIYDodecadLinux64 dv3.par

]]> Comment on DIY Dodecad 2.0 results by ivan http://aeom.net/blog/2011/08/diy-dodecad-2-0-results/#comment-7 ivan Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:54:19 +0000 http://striz.net/?p=1364#comment-7 how did you do to have a paint_byseg.txt file? i don't understand from the read me how to operate the 2.0 release although i did just ok with 1.0. thanks how did you do to have a paint_byseg.txt file? i don’t understand from the read me how to operate the 2.0 release although i did just ok with 1.0. thanks

]]> Comment on The Casey Anthony verdict by Martin http://aeom.net/blog/2011/07/the-casey-anthony-verdict/#comment-6 Martin Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:57:11 +0000 http://striz.net/?p=1253#comment-6 The comments have been so general that I'm not quite sure whether I'm being fooled by next generation spam bots, but the links aren't for Viagra, so I'll let it go for now. :) The comments have been so general that I’m not quite sure whether I’m being fooled by next generation spam bots, but the links aren’t for Viagra, so I’ll let it go for now. :)

]]> Comment on PubMed woes by Martin http://aeom.net/blog/2011/05/pubmed-woes/#comment-5 Martin Fri, 20 May 2011 15:22:15 +0000 http://striz.net/?p=1104#comment-5 Thanks Erika. Glad to see there is an author ID project in the works. I wish a similar project existed for affiliation. I would love to be able to enter a single search term and pull up the publication history of an entire department, center, or institute. That's unfortunate for "Wisconsin", but "Biology" is particularly bad, because there are so many derivatives, like neurobiology and microbiology. :) Thanks Erika. Glad to see there is an author ID project in the works. I wish a similar project existed for affiliation. I would love to be able to enter a single search term and pull up the publication history of an entire department, center, or institute.

That’s unfortunate for “Wisconsin”, but “Biology” is particularly bad, because there are so many derivatives, like neurobiology and microbiology. :)

]]> Comment on PubMed woes by Erika http://aeom.net/blog/2011/05/pubmed-woes/#comment-4 Erika Fri, 20 May 2011 14:59:55 +0000 http://striz.net/?p=1104#comment-4 You popped up in my RSS feed for PubMed. This is a big problem in PubMed, esp. because the affiliation search *only* looks for the affiliation of the first author. There is an author ID project underway, but no ETA on when it will be ready. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/nd10/nd10_pm_author_id.html. Web of Science does a much better job of looking for author affiliations, although I'm not sure it's possible to get as granular as departmental affiliaton. But hey, could be worse--you could be at University of Wisconsin! Unfortunately, NIH is on Wisconsin Ave. in Bethesda, and that *really* muddies up the author searches... You popped up in my RSS feed for PubMed. This is a big problem in PubMed, esp. because the affiliation search *only* looks for the affiliation of the first author. There is an author ID project underway, but no ETA on when it will be ready. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/nd10/nd10_pm_author_id.html.
Web of Science does a much better job of looking for author affiliations, although I’m not sure it’s possible to get as granular as departmental affiliaton.

But hey, could be worse–you could be at University of Wisconsin! Unfortunately, NIH is on Wisconsin Ave. in Bethesda, and that *really* muddies up the author searches…

]]> Comment on Use your own WebDav server to sync Zotero by Martin http://aeom.net/blog/2011/03/use-your-own-webdav-server-to-sync-zotero/#comment-3 Martin Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:05:28 +0000 http://striz.net/?p=889#comment-3 Thanks for the heads up. Thanks for the heads up.

]]> Comment on Use your own WebDav server to sync Zotero by Sebastian http://aeom.net/blog/2011/03/use-your-own-webdav-server-to-sync-zotero/#comment-2 Sebastian Sat, 12 Mar 2011 19:14:39 +0000 http://striz.net/?p=889#comment-2 "Of course, an easier alternative is to sync your Zotero files with Dropbox, which offers 2 GB of storage for free. Under the Advanced Zotero options, change the Data Directory Location to your Dropbox folder." please don't do that. It's an almost surefire way to, at one point, corrupt your Zotero database, potentially irretrievably. If you ever, by any accident leave FF open on two locations and do anything with Zotero on one of them that can be enough. You can use a sym-link from your storage directory to dropbox, thus only syncing your files through dropbox and use Zotero's free data-sync for the rest. But I can't warn strongly enough against the dangers of putting your zotero.sqlite into dropbox. “Of course, an easier alternative is to sync your Zotero files with Dropbox, which offers 2 GB of storage for free. Under the Advanced Zotero options, change the Data Directory Location to your Dropbox folder.”

please don’t do that. It’s an almost surefire way to, at one point, corrupt your Zotero database, potentially irretrievably. If you ever, by any accident leave FF open on two locations and do anything with Zotero on one of them that can be enough.
You can use a sym-link from your storage directory to dropbox, thus only syncing your files through dropbox and use Zotero’s free data-sync for the rest.
But I can’t warn strongly enough against the dangers of putting your zotero.sqlite into dropbox.

]]>